artwranglers.com.au header image 1

the NMA has no idea

March 25th, 2009 · 1 Comment

nma_prau_500…who made this painting on bark currently on display. So it’s on exhibition without a label! The National Museum of Australia has a long history of exhibiting copies and facsmilies without attribution, so this example is but a continuation of their curatorial standards (sic). Several experts agree that this representation of a Macassan Prau is most likely a copy produced and sold in the 60s or 70s in one of the Brisbane missionary societies, either the Central Methodist Mission, in Albert St, or the Anglican Church Mission, in Ann Street. A history yet to be told… These pictures were painted by Aboriginal people (probably), and there are many examples of this kind of “Brisbane bark paintings” floating around the secondary market. But what a pity that the NMA didn’t draw on its extensive holdings of authentic bark paintings from NE Arnhem Land to make their point? Here’s another example: signed “Tracey”, “Tracey Bull”, and “Kellie Bull” on verso.

nl_prau_500

Tags: In Other News

1 response so far ↓

  • 1 for NMA watchers: Craddock takes a hit from Paul // Apr 25, 2009 at 11:13 am

    [...] This weekend Paul Keating strikes back at last weekend’s puff piece about Director Craddock Morton’s own account of the limitations of the National Museum of Australia. Paul can’t help a bon mot or two, describing John Howard as “possessing the cultural and artistic sensibilities of a filing cabinet”, as he gives his account of the decisions made on his watch. “The salient point, however, is that having brought forth a lemon, the principal advocates of a museum of Australia are now setting up the apologia for its failure”. For our part, ArtWranglers has been more concerned with the micro than the macro: read back along the thread. [...]

Leave a Comment