<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the NMA has no idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://artwranglers.com.au/the-nma-has-no-idea/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://artwranglers.com.au/the-nma-has-no-idea/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 21:31:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: for NMA watchers: Craddock takes a hit from Paul</title>
		<link>http://artwranglers.com.au/the-nma-has-no-idea/comment-page-1/#comment-4595</link>
		<dc:creator>for NMA watchers: Craddock takes a hit from Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://artwranglers.com.au/?p=2467#comment-4595</guid>
		<description>[...] This weekend Paul Keating strikes back at last weekend&#8217;s puff piece about Director Craddock Morton&#8217;s own account of the limitations of the National Museum of Australia. Paul can&#8217;t help a bon mot or two, describing John Howard as &#8220;possessing the cultural and artistic sensibilities of a filing cabinet&#8221;, as he gives his account of the decisions made on his watch. &#8220;The salient point, however, is that having brought forth a lemon, the principal advocates of a museum of Australia are now setting up the apologia for its failure&#8221;. For our part, ArtWranglers has been more concerned with the micro than the macro: read back along the thread. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This weekend Paul Keating strikes back at last weekend&#8217;s puff piece about Director Craddock Morton&#8217;s own account of the limitations of the National Museum of Australia. Paul can&#8217;t help a bon mot or two, describing John Howard as &#8220;possessing the cultural and artistic sensibilities of a filing cabinet&#8221;, as he gives his account of the decisions made on his watch. &#8220;The salient point, however, is that having brought forth a lemon, the principal advocates of a museum of Australia are now setting up the apologia for its failure&#8221;. For our part, ArtWranglers has been more concerned with the micro than the macro: read back along the thread. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

